Amaravati: HC Orders Shield for TTD Theft Witnesses
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has stepped in with firm directives amid the escalating tensions in the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) Parakamani theft case. Citing deep concerns over the safety of those involved, the bench emphasized the need for unwavering protection, especially after the shocking demise of a key figure.
This comes against the backdrop of former TTD Assistant Vigilance and Security Officer Y. Satish Kumar‘s death, now classified as a murder. Found near railway tracks in Tadipatri on November 14, 2025, Satish was set to face questioning by the Crime Investigation Department (CID). His passing has intensified scrutiny on potential threats in the probe.
Court’s Protective Measures
In a clear move to prevent further risks, the High Court ordered the CID Director General to ensure comprehensive security for accused CV Ravi Kumar and all witnesses. Full safeguards must remain in place until the trial concludes, with no room for lapses that could endanger lives.
The judges highlighted the importance of smooth proceedings, urging authorities to prioritize witness security and avoid any undue interference. This directive underscores the court’s resolve to uphold justice in a case riddled with procedural controversies.
Case Timeline and Next Steps
The Parakamani incident, involving the alleged theft of foreign currency from temple offerings in 2023, saw an initial compromise via Lok Adalat. However, the High Court nullified that in October 2025, mandating a fresh CID investigation.
Satish’s role in flagging the theft added layers of intrigue, leading to an FIR and multiple probe teams. The next hearing is slated for December 2, 2025, where updates on the murder inquiry and overall case will be reviewed.
- Key Developments:
- Theft reported in April 2023; Ravi Kumar accused of pocketing USD 900.
- Lok Adalat settlement quashed; reinvestigation ordered.
- Satish’s murder probe ongoing, with scene reconstruction underway.
- 12 special teams deployed for thorough inquiries.
As the temple’s sanctity hangs in balance, these orders signal a push for transparency and accountability in one of Andhra’s most sensitive scandals.