INTERNATIONAL: Trump Warns Musk: DOGE Could “Eat” Him Over Subsidies
Escalating Tensions Over Legislation
The ongoing discord between U.S. President Donald Trump and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has intensified, centered on Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill.” Musk’s vocal opposition to the legislation has sparked a public feud, with Trump escalating rhetoric during a recent Florida visit.
Trump’s DOGE Metaphor
Trump suggested that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), previously co-led by Musk, could be weaponized to scrutinize Musk’s government subsidies. Labeling DOGE a “monster” that might “eat” Musk, Trump implied potential investigations into Musk’s companies, such as Tesla and SpaceX, to curb federal spending.
Musk’s Critique of the Bill
Musk has publicly condemned the “Big Beautiful Bill,” arguing it undermines efforts to reduce government expenditure. In posts on X, he threatened to back primary challenges against Congress members supporting the bill, citing its $5 trillion debt ceiling increase as fiscally irresponsible.
Subsidies Under Scrutiny
Trump highlighted Musk’s reliance on government subsidies for SpaceX’s rocket launches and Tesla’s electric vehicle production. He suggested that without these funds, Musk’s enterprises might falter, framing DOGE as a tool to reclaim taxpayer money.
Musk’s Political Maneuvers
In response, Musk hinted at forming a new political party and vowed to hold accountable lawmakers who supported the bill. His departure from DOGE leadership has not diminished his influence, as he continues to shape public discourse on government spending.
Implications for Policy and Politics
The clash underscores broader tensions over federal spending and corporate subsidies. Trump’s remarks about potentially deporting Musk, a South African-born U.S. citizen, add a provocative layer to the dispute, raising questions about political retribution.
Public and Market Reactions
Musk’s criticisms have stirred market volatility, with Tesla’s stock dropping 6% following Trump’s DOGE threats. The feud has also fueled debates on X about the role of subsidies in innovation and the boundaries of political loyalty.