SC Rejects Petitions in Andhra Pradesh Liquor Scam Case
Dismissal of Legal Challenges
The Supreme Court of India has dismissed petitions filed by Raj Kesireddy and his father, Upendra Reddy, in connection with the Andhra Pradesh liquor scam case. The ruling, delivered on May 23, 2025, marks a significant setback for the primary accused, Raj Kesireddy, who challenged the legality of his arrest.
Allegations of Procedural Irregularities
Upendra Reddy’s petition alleged that authorities failed to adhere to legal protocols during his son’s arrest. Raj Kesireddy separately contended that his detention was unlawful, seeking judicial intervention to quash the proceedings. Both petitions were heard by a bench led by Justice Parthiwala on May 19, 2025, with the verdict reserved until the recent pronouncement.
Court’s Directive on Bail
The Supreme Court declined to grant relief, noting that Raj Kesireddy, already in police custody, must pursue bail through the appropriate lower court. The bench emphasized that the petitions did not warrant intervention at this stage, effectively upholding the ongoing investigation into the alleged ₹3200-crore liquor scam.
Context of the Liquor Scam
The case involves accusations of financial irregularities and mismanagement in Andhra Pradesh’s liquor trade during the YSR Congress Party’s tenure. Raj Kesireddy, identified as the prime accused, is among several individuals, including former government officials, under scrutiny by the Special Investigation Team (SIT).
Implications for Ongoing Probe
The dismissal strengthens the SIT’s position as it continues to probe the high-profile case, which has also implicated figures like Dhanunjaya Reddy and Krishna Mohan. The court’s decision signals that legal challenges to procedural aspects of arrests will face stringent scrutiny, potentially accelerating the investigation.
AP Liquor Scam Case Overview
Case Details
- Primary Accused: Raj Kesireddy (A1)
- Other Accused: Dhanunjaya Reddy, Krishna Mohan, Sajja Sridhar Reddy, others
- Allegations: Financial irregularities in liquor trade, estimated at ₹3200 crore
- Investigating Body: Special Investigation Team (SIT)
Legal Developments
- Petitions Filed: Raj Kesireddy and Upendra Reddy challenged arrest legality
- Supreme Court Hearing: Conducted on May 19, 2025, by Justice Parthiwala’s bench
- Verdict: Petitions dismissed; accused directed to seek bail in lower court
- Arrest Status: Raj Kesireddy remains in custody; SIT seeks further interrogation