NATIONAL: Life Term in Anna University Rape Case Triggers Political Clash in Tamil Nadu
Convict Sentenced to Life Imprisonment
A special women’s court in Chennai has sentenced Gnanasekharan, the primary accused in the Anna University rape case, to life imprisonment. The court found him guilty of the brutal sexual assault of a 19-year-old engineering student that occurred on December 23 last year.
The crime took place within the university premises, where the survivor was approached by two men while she was speaking with a friend. After assaulting her companion, the perpetrators raped the woman and later threatened her with the release of photographs on social media to prevent her from lodging a complaint.
AIADMK Alleges Political Cover-Up
Following the verdict, the AIADMK launched sharp accusations against the ruling DMK government. Former Chief Minister and Leader of the Opposition, E. Palaniswami, claimed that the investigation was deliberately fast-tracked to protect others allegedly involved in the incident.
He stated, “The DMK has buried key details to shield the broader conspiracy. Only one person has been punished while the involvement of others has been deliberately ignored. The truth will emerge once AIADMK returns to power.”
CM Stalin Rejects Allegations
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. K. Stalin swiftly responded to the accusations. He defended the police and judicial process, emphasizing that the investigation was conducted with precision and transparency. Stalin highlighted that law enforcement acted promptly and delivered justice within five months.
“The police acted swiftly, and the judiciary has appreciated their work. Those feigning concern for women’s safety are only politicizing a tragedy,” Stalin remarked in a strongly worded rebuttal.
Case Timeline and Public Reaction
The December 2024 incident caused statewide outrage, sparking protests and widespread condemnation. Public pressure compelled authorities to expedite the investigation. Gnanasekharan was apprehended and prosecuted under stringent provisions, including charges of rape, criminal intimidation, and assault.
The case became a touchstone for discussions around campus safety and the efficacy of state law enforcement. The court’s judgment is being hailed as a strong precedent in gender-based crime litigation.