India Condemns Pakistan at UNSC, Cites Terrorism in Mumbai and Pahalgam Attacks
India sharply criticized Pakistan at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), accusing it of fostering terrorism, specifically referencing the 2008 Mumbai attacks and the April 2025 Pahalgam killings. The remarks, delivered by India’s Permanent Representative Parvathaneni Harish, underscored Pakistan’s alleged role as a global hub for terrorist activities.
Strong Rebuke at UNSC
During a UNSC debate on civilian safety, India lambasted Pakistan for its alleged support of terrorism, citing the 2008 Mumbai attacks and the recent Pahalgam attack that killed 26 civilians. Harish asserted that Pakistan’s history of nurturing terrorist organizations disqualifies it from discussing civilian protection.
Pahalgam Attack and Indus Waters Treaty
India linked Pakistan’s alleged misinformation campaign following the Pahalgam attack to the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty. Harish described Pakistan’s actions as an attempt to deflect responsibility for its role in cross-border terrorism, which India claims has claimed over 20,000 civilian lives.
Pakistan’s UNSC Remarks
Pakistan’s envoy, Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, raised the Kashmir issue during the UNSC discussion, emphasizing water as a lifeline rather than a weapon. India dismissed these remarks, arguing that Pakistan’s engagement in such debates insults the international community given its terrorism record.
Operation Sindoor Revelations
India highlighted Pakistan’s alleged complicity in terrorism by noting that its government, police, and military officials attended funerals of terrorists killed during Operation Sindoor. This, Harish argued, demonstrates Pakistan’s failure to distinguish between civilians and terrorists.
Civilian Casualties and Accountability
India accused Pakistan of using civilians as shields to promote terrorism, citing decades of attacks, including the 2001 Parliament assault and the 2008 Mumbai attacks. The Pahalgam attack, described as a “barbaric mass murder,” was presented as evidence of ongoing threats to civilian safety.
India’s Stance on Treaty Suspension
Harish reiterated that India will not reconsider the Indus Waters Treaty suspension as long as Pakistan supports cross-border terrorism. This stance reflects India’s resolve to counter terrorism through diplomatic and strategic measures.
UNSC’s Response to Pahalgam
The UNSC condemned the Pahalgam attack, with members rejecting Pakistan’s attempts to internationalize the issue. India’s targeted response to the attack was recognized as legitimate by the Council, though China reportedly softened the statement to shield Pakistan.
Escalating Tensions
The exchange underscores heightened India-Pakistan tensions, with India’s Operation Sindoor targeting terror bases in response to the Pahalgam attack. The UNSC debate highlights the ongoing challenge of addressing cross-border terrorism diplomatically.
Broader Implications
India’s strong rhetoric at the UNSC signals a firm stance against terrorism and a call for global accountability. The reference to historical and recent attacks aims to galvanize international support for India’s counter-terrorism efforts.