Amaravati: AP High Court Halts Action Against Jagan in Death Case
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has granted temporary relief to former Chief Minister Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy in the Cheeli Singaiah death case, postponing the hearing on his quash petition to July 1, 2025. The court directed authorities to refrain from precipitous actions against Reddy and other YSRCP leaders until the next hearing. This development follows the seizure of Reddy’s vehicle, intensifying scrutiny in the high-profile case.
Interim Relief in Singaiah Case
On June 27, 2025, Justice Y. Lakshmana Rao adjourned the hearing on Reddy’s quash petition, filed to dismiss charges linked to the death of Cheeli Singaiah, a 55-year-old YSRCP supporter allegedly struck by Reddy’s convoy on June 18 in Palnadu. The court’s order extends to YSRCP leaders Y.V. Subba Reddy, Vidala Rajini, Perni Nani, and KNR, barring any coercive measures until July 1.
Vehicle Inspection and Case Background
Authorities inspected Reddy’s bulletproof vehicle (AP 40 DH 2349) on June 24 at his Tadepalli residence, with the Regional Transport Office verifying its fitness under Motor Vehicle Inspector Gangadhar Prasad. The vehicle, seized by Guntur police, is central to allegations that it caused Singaiah’s death during a convoy movement. A case was registered at Nallapadu police station, naming Reddy as A2, the driver as A1, and others as co-accused.
Additional Legal Challenges
Beyond the Singaiah case, Reddy faces another legal hurdle stemming from a February 19, 2025, visit to a Guntur chili yard, where he allegedly made political speeches in violation of the election code. Police issued notices to YSRCP leaders, including Ambati Rambabu and Lella Appi Reddy, for unauthorized activities in a government-regulated market area. This case adds to the legal pressures on Reddy and his party.
Political Reactions and Allegations
Posts on X reveal polarized sentiments, with YSRCP supporters alleging political vendetta by the state government, while critics, including TDP leaders, highlight Reddy’s involvement in multiple cases. The YSRCP claims police failed to provide adequate security during Reddy’s tour, a point contested by authorities. The controversy underscores ongoing political tensions in Andhra Pradesh.
Implications for Reddy and YSRCP
The court’s interim order offers Reddy temporary respite, but the July 1 hearing will be pivotal in determining the case’s trajectory. The outcome could influence public perception and the YSRCP’s political standing amid broader allegations of targeted legal actions. The case highlights the complex interplay of legal and political dynamics in the state.