INTERNATIONAL: China’s Defiant Stand on US Tariff Push
China has sharply criticized the United States for urging NATO and G7 nations to impose tariffs on countries purchasing Russian oil, labeling it an act of “unilateral bullying.”
The remarks coincide with ongoing trade talks between Chinese and US delegations in Madrid, Spain, starting September 15, 2025. Beijing warned of countermeasures if Washington’s proposals are implemented.
Foreign Ministry’s Firm Response
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian, during a press briefing, defended China’s economic ties with Russia as legitimate and compliant with international law.
He condemned the US approach as economic coercion that disrupts global trade frameworks.
Lin emphasized that such actions threaten the stability of international supply chains and fail to resolve conflicts through intimidation.
Context of US Tariff Advocacy
US President Donald Trump, in a September 13, 2025, social media post, called for NATO countries to halt Russian oil purchases and impose 50-100% tariffs on China for its role in buying Russian petroleum.
He argued that these measures would pressure Russia to end the Ukraine conflict, criticizing some NATO members for their ongoing trade with Moscow.
Trump’s remarks followed a US Treasury push, led by Secretary Scott Bessent, urging G7 finance ministers to adopt similar sanctions to curb Russia’s war funding.
China’s Stance on Ukraine and Trade
Lin reiterated China’s consistent position on the Russia-Ukraine conflict, advocating dialogue and negotiation as the only viable solutions.
He noted that many countries, including the US and European nations, continue to trade with Russia, underscoring the normalcy of such exchanges.
China firmly opposes unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction, asserting that its cooperation with Russia adheres to World Trade Organization principles and should remain free from interference.
Broader Implications
The timing of China’s response, amid trade talks in Madrid, highlights escalating tensions between the two economic powers.
Beijing’s pledge to retaliate signals potential disruptions in bilateral relations if the US advances its tariff agenda.
The dispute reflects broader challenges in balancing geopolitical strategies with global economic stability as nations navigate the fallout of the Russia-Ukraine war.